Date and time: November 7, Tuesday, 12:15 a.m. Location: Carlos Santamaría Building, Room B14. Speaker: Javier Suárez (http://www.ub.edu/grc_logos/javier-suarez1) is PhD student in philosophy at the University of Barcelona and the University of Exeter. Abstract: Holobionts are biological entities that consist of a multicellular … Continue reading
Date and Time: November 7, Tuesday, 11:00 a.m. Location: Carlos Santamaría Building, Room B14. Speaker: Marc Canciani Abstract: The superorganism, in the context of eusociality, is typically either understood as a heuristic tool used to better understand group dynamics within colonies or as a … Continue reading
Date and Time: October 24, Tuesday, 11:00 a.m. Location: Carlos Santamaría Building, Room B14. Speaker: Mark Bedau (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Bedau) Abstract: Darwin showed that biological populations evolve by natural selection., Some have suggested that natural selection also applies to the evolution of human cultures. Let us … Continue reading
Date and Time: October 25, Wednesday, 15:30 p.m.
Location: Carlos Santamaría Building, Room B14.
Speaker: Mark Bedau (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Bedau)
Abstract: The question how to define life is very controversial, with many answers proposed but no signs of any emerging consensus. This raises a second question, the meta-question about life: Why is the definition of life so difficult and so controversial? Various answers to the meta-question have been proposed, such as being limited to a sample size for life of only one (Sterelny, Cleland), or confusion over homonyms that share a core meaning (Shields), or our failure to recognize impossible to answer question about folk concepts and pointless questions about scientific concepts (Machery), or our mistake of human kinds for natural kinds (Keller). Most contemporary discussions of defining life and resolving its controversies seem to presuppose a Cartesian perspective on the problem, focused on whether we can identify necessary and sufficient conditions for individual living organism. This contrasts with an Aristotelian perspective on the problem, focused on finding the best explanation of the characteristic phenomena involving life, such as life’s hallmarks, its borderline cases, and its characteristic puzzles. I argue replacing the Cartesian perspective with the Aristotelian perspective provides more promise for answering the meta-question about life, and thereby eventually resolving how to define life.
- (English) Sensorimotor Life: An Enactive Proposal, OUP 2017
- IAS-Research Talk by Mª José Ferreira: “Disentangling causation and information: informational parity at issue”
- Seminar on “The history and theory of vitalism, from Descartes to Canguilhem” by Charles Wolfe (University of Ghent)
- IAS-Research Talks by Charles Wolfe (Gent) and Fred Keijzer (Groningen)
- Talk by Davide Vecchi: “Challenging the consensus: intrinsicalism and the minimal genome”
- IAS-Research Talk by Davide Vecchi: “Biological individuality and the challenge posed by the ubiquity of multi-species partnerships”
- IAS-Research Seminar by Ramiro Frick: “Comunicación biológica: hacia una perspectiva organizacional”
- “Evolvability as a dispositional property”
- From organization of processes to organisms and other biological individuals